From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Jul  5 16:44:52 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4ECA2628
 for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Sat,  5 Jul 2014 16:44:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "wonkity.com", Issuer "wonkity.com" (not verified))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED99E2910
 for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Sat,  5 Jul 2014 16:44:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s65GimH4008483
 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO);
 Sat, 5 Jul 2014 10:44:48 -0600 (MDT)
 (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com)
Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost)
 by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) with ESMTP id s65Gil5d008480;
 Sat, 5 Jul 2014 10:44:48 -0600 (MDT)
 (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com)
Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2014 10:44:47 -0600 (MDT)
From: Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com>
To: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Marko_Cupa=E6?= <marko.cupac@mimar.rs>
Subject: Re: Should 9.3 carry a warning about NEW_XORG
In-Reply-To: <20140705144740.ec111026afe7f65a4c87ba17@mimar.rs>
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.11.1407051025210.8233@wonkity.com>
References: <53B69B88.4060803@gmail.com>
 <E1X32XF-000PnU-QG@dilbert.ingresso.co.uk>
 <CAPyFy2BhARs+wxhOuP-09tcPgzerU00_ARy=o4OyKec9azTOkQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20140705103235.GB7680@rwpc15.gfn.riverwillow.net.au>
 <alpine.BSF.2.11.1407050455010.5138@wonkity.com>
 <20140705144740.ec111026afe7f65a4c87ba17@mimar.rs>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (BSF 23 2013-08-11)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3
 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sat, 05 Jul 2014 10:44:49 -0600 (MDT)
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Jul 2014 16:44:52 -0000

On Sat, 5 Jul 2014, Marko Cupa? wrote:

> On Sat, 5 Jul 2014 04:58:32 -0600 (MDT)
> Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com> wrote:
>
>> There is a list of video cards, both working and non-working:
>> https://wiki.freebsd.org/Graphics#Video_cards
>
> My Intel HD P4000 works fine for months now on 10.0-RELEASE-p3 amd64
> WITH_NEW_XORG and WITH_GALLIUM, which questions the accuracy of the
> list you mention, as it states that i[357]-4xxx are not supported.

More precisely, it says that Haswell processors with 4000-series video 
are not yet supported.  Some of the Ivy Bridge processors had HD 4000 
video:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_Intel_graphics_processing_units

I don't know if HD4000 video is supported on on Ivy Bridge processors, 
but would guess that it is.  Which processor do you have?