From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 16 12:42:16 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D7851065825; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 12:42:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gavin@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7574A8FC26; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 12:42:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gavin@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gavin@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n3GCgGin063940; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 12:42:16 GMT (envelope-from gavin@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gavin@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n3GCgG4u063936; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 12:42:16 GMT (envelope-from gavin) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 12:42:16 GMT Message-Id: <200904161242.n3GCgG4u063936@freefall.freebsd.org> To: alan@pair.com, gavin@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.org From: gavin@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: bin/108390: [libc] [patch] wait4() erroneously waits for all children when SIGCHLD is SIG_IGN [regression] X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 12:42:21 -0000 Synopsis: [libc] [patch] wait4() erroneously waits for all children when SIGCHLD is SIG_IGN [regression] State-Changed-From-To: closed->open State-Changed-By: gavin State-Changed-When: Thu Apr 16 12:37:19 UTC 2009 State-Changed-Why: Reopen, there's some question about whether the bug reported here is indeed a bug: FreeBSD behaves differently to both Solaris 10 and Linux (Ubuntu 8.04) in how wait4() functions. Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-standards Responsible-Changed-By: gavin Responsible-Changed-When: Thu Apr 16 12:37:19 UTC 2009 Responsible-Changed-Why: Over to -standards. There is some debate as to what the correct behaviour is here, hopefully -standards will be able to provide an opinion. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=108390