From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 10 14:47:20 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0556716A4CE for ; Sun, 10 Oct 2004 14:47:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from node15.coopprint.com (node15.cooperativeprinting.com [208.4.77.15]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7160443D46 for ; Sun, 10 Oct 2004 14:47:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ryans@gamersimpact.com) Received: (qmail 70895 invoked by uid 0); 10 Oct 2004 14:46:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.5?) (63.231.165.205) by node15.coopprint.com with SMTP; 10 Oct 2004 14:46:29 -0000 Message-ID: <41694B7C.2090205@gamersimpact.com> Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2004 09:47:24 -0500 From: Ryan Sommers User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (Windows/20040803) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Oleg V. Nauman" References: <20041010131532.GG61535@core.zp.ua> In-Reply-To: <20041010131532.GG61535@core.zp.ua> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mount_msdosfs tries to load nonexistent libiconv.so X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2004 14:47:20 -0000 Oleg V. Nauman wrote: > So, my questions: >1. Why dependens for the third party software not documented in the >man 8 mount_msdosfs? > > What version of FreeBSD are you on? Your mount_msdosfs binary is looking for /lib/libiconv.so which I think is now /lib/libkiconv.so.1 (that's what my mount_msdosfs look for anyway). I imagine this is because of the recent library version bump, and doing an upgrade of your world (and kernel depending how out of date your world is) will get you going. >2. And why not exist any fallbacks (seat bealts) for this behaviour >in the system vital software such mount? Well, I'm ready for looking >any '?' instead any russian letters :) but not DoS for my system under >next reboot. This behaviour prevents from normal booting process and >causes to prompt me for enter shell - yes, we are in the single user >mode without any problems... > > There is a seatbelt for this. Boot into single user mode. mount -uo rw /; mount /usr; vi /etc/fstab. Comment out the offending fstab line and then reboot. You'll be able to go multi-user while fixing the problem. -- Ryan Sommers ryans@gamersimpact.com