From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 12 04:56:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E11EA16A401 for ; Wed, 12 Apr 2006 04:56:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 477A043D49 for ; Wed, 12 Apr 2006 04:56:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from 209-6-22-29.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.22.29]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 12 Apr 2006 00:56:08 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.04,113,1144036800"; d="scan'208"; a="223681974:sNHT529387334" From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17468.34966.861019.312959@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 00:56:54 -0400 To: questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta26) "endive" XEmacs Lucid Cc: Subject: Undefined symbol in /usr/lib/libpthread.so X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 04:56:10 -0000 While running through various log files, I ran into this in /var/log/http-error.log: [error] [client 10.0.0.1] /usr/lib/libpthread.so.1: Undefined symbol "__malloc_lock" So I checked some other bits and ran into this: huff@>> /usr/local/etc/rc.d/spamass-milter.sh start Starting spamass_milter. Assertion failed: (__isthreaded == 0 || malloc_initialized), function malloc_init, file /usr/src/lib/libc/stdlib/malloc.c, line 4236. Abort trap (core dumped) I'm running: FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT #0: Mon Mar 13 09:23:39 EST 2006 This smells like fallout from the malloc change. Did I catch -Current at a bad moment (and should rebuild), or is there an adjustment needed elsewhere? Thanks, Robert Huff