From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 13 17:42:30 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FBD516A4CE for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2004 17:42:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp1.supranet.net (horse.supranet.net [66.170.1.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2C5943D1F for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2004 17:42:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jeffc@supranet.net) Received: from jeffc (adsl-209-204-169-179.sonic.net [209.204.169.179]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp1.supranet.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i1E1gM4Y004874 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NOT); Fri, 13 Feb 2004 19:42:23 -0600 (CST) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 17:42:24 -0800 From: Jeff Chan X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.62q) Personal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <96987389.20040213174224@supranet.net> To: Sergey Matveychuk In-Reply-To: <402D696B.4090800@ciam.ru> References: <279571446.20040213132535@supranet.net> <7010358845.20040213134148@supranet.net> <402D696B.4090800@ciam.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: ports@FreeBSD.org cc: Jeremy Messenger Subject: Re[2]: SpamCannibal X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: jeffc@supranet.net List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 01:42:30 -0000 On Friday, February 13, 2004, 4:18:51 PM, Sergey Matveychuk wrote: > Jeff Chan wrote: >> Hello Jeremy, >> Fair enough. My coding/porting skills are pretty flabby at this >> point, which is why I was hoping there was a queue of cool things >> for the existing ports crew to check out. Is there a way you >> can forward my suggestion to other folks who are already familiar >> with the porting process? > We all began with something. We took an aplication we like and made us > first port. > Get it try! And ask any questions here. Thanks Sergey, I may take a hack at it. I was also somewhat hoping for a comment by the clueful as to whether the SpamCannibal approach had merit, wasn't too abusive itself, didn't violate RFCs, etc. Jeff C. -- Jeff Chan mailto:jeffc@supranet.net http://www.supranet.net/