From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 2 21:55:43 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6065D16A4CE for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2004 21:55:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from grummit.biaix.org (86.Red-213-97-212.pooles.rima-tde.net [213.97.212.86]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A140143D5A for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2004 21:55:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists-freebsd-current@biaix.org) Received: (qmail 27988 invoked by uid 1000); 2 Nov 2004 21:53:14 -0000 Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2004 22:53:14 +0100 From: Joan Picanyol To: current@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20041102215314.GA27822@grummit.biaix.org> Mail-Followup-To: current@freebsd.org References: <27404.1099146185@critter.freebsd.dk> <4183A771.7080906@liwing.de> <20041102130412.GI10641@sitadelle.com> <20041102122439.J33456@sasami.jurai.net> <20041102174632.GL10641@sitadelle.com> <20041102210023.GM10641@sitadelle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041102210023.GM10641@sitadelle.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Subject: Re: HEADSUP: Filesystem rototiling over X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2004 21:55:43 -0000 * Jeremie Le Hen [20041102 22:00]: > The following patch nullifies the previous one, since it does not > require to add the -c option to mount(8)/umount(8). > It adds two variables to default/rc.conf : > > jail_example_mount_enable="NO" > jail_example_fstab="" > > When the first one is made true, then rc.d/jail will mount (resp. > umount) the filesystems described in the file pointed by the second > one when the jail will be started (resp. stopped). If the second one > is left empty, then it will default to "/etc/fstab.${jail}". Nice :) > PS: Once the patch has been successfuly tested by either me or someone > else, should I send a PR ? Of course, and make sure someone commits it someday... qvb -- pica