From owner-freebsd-questions Wed May 24 5:31:54 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from cx344940-a.meta1.la.home.com (cx344940-a.meta1.la.home.com [24.6.21.74]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88AC637B56A for ; Wed, 24 May 2000 05:31:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from conrads@cx344940-a.meta1.la.home.com) Received: (from conrads@localhost) by cx344940-a.meta1.la.home.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id HAA43316; Wed, 24 May 2000 07:31:42 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from conrads) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.4.0 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 24 May 2000 07:31:42 -0500 (CDT) Organization: @Home Network From: Conrad Sabatier To: Doug Barton Subject: RE: fxp not "Etherexpress" any more? Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 24-May-00 Doug Barton wrote: > I'm looking through online stores to try and find a good deal on > our old friend "Intel Etherexpress Pro/100+" and it seems that Intel has > dropped the "Etherexpress" word from the name, yes? I looked through the > mail archives and this is the conclusion I come to, although I couldn't > find an e-mail where someone came right out and said it. It's the 82559 > chip, and it's listed on Intel's web site as their top of the line, > whereas I could not find any references to "Etherexpress". I'm using the Intel PRO/100+ Management Adapter, which appears to be what the EtherExpress is called now. :-) Works fine as the fxp device. -- Conrad Sabatier http://members.home.net/conrads/ ICQ# 1147270 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message