From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 1 21:30:53 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F21C6106566B; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 21:30:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lumiwa@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-f54.google.com (mail-yw0-f54.google.com [209.85.213.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 962078FC0C; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 21:30:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yhgm50 with SMTP id m50so2453114yhg.13 for ; Fri, 01 Jun 2012 14:30:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=Pt3HTtD2bVkRPpXSb17Yp68s6890dcxtA1DUx17fWWc=; b=T/lH7rJtLcgDO1FzDZk5by8S3NnWOcNO34Fn5xF2Jk0aKYevDNtsVyjCmlFvA6rrqu H1Bjxee8mGvfwSDVzrfsYO5YWVDcwh5mwwvuf7R1ENL/62zuPM1uDB32EaDvfVWWgEXM MKj2uJekPJdy9ENoqVopz2PfDw4SyGUcWaNdAQ33zpha3pw73EBfrfWzZ0DXec5Aks3P b6WCzO4HW6029iZxu34i0FfxCJ15ooPhQvR+nrnXwhlu1ok+o+qskzI5ssNy2d0zGYrm /ulyuJkGj6zsVUO2LQEawp6EitFne9HxRv5ODqNQhnqdYSRvXG6iD1XOwuRnwVlJUFHj qZag== Received: by 10.50.214.66 with SMTP id ny2mr3197013igc.0.1338586245836; Fri, 01 Jun 2012 14:30:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from luna.wi.rr.com (cpe-184-58-138-79.wi.res.rr.com. [184.58.138.79]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f8sm989422ign.0.2012.06.01.14.30.44 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 01 Jun 2012 14:30:45 -0700 (PDT) From: ajtiM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2012 16:30:34 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/9.0-RELEASE; KDE/4.8.3; i386; ; ) References: <4FC873F2.5030102@gmail.com> <4FC87E89.3050609@my.gd> <4FC88A78.2090902@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4FC88A78.2090902@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201206011630.35183.lumiwa@gmail.com> Cc: Damien Fleuriot , Matthew Seaman Subject: Re: FreeBSD ports patch count X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 21:30:53 -0000 On Friday 01 June 2012 04:25:12 Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 01/06/2012 09:34, Damien Fleuriot wrote: > > On 6/1/12 9:49 AM, Brent Clark wrote: > >> Hiya > >> > >> I would just like to ask / know. Did anything weird or wonderful happen > >> on the FreeBSD ports. > >> > >> To show you what I mean. > >> > >> [root@torry /usr/home/bclark]# portaudit -F -a; portsnap fetch update; > >> pkg_version -vIL=; freebsd-update fetch install > >> auditfile.tbz 100% of 77 kB 6570 Bps > >> 00m00s > >> New database installed. > >> 0 problem(s) in your installed packages found. > >> Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 9 mirrors found. > >> Fetching snapshot tag from geodns-1.portsnap.freebsd.org... done. > >> Fetching snapshot metadata... done. > >> Updating from Thu May 31 19:58:31 SAST 2012 to Fri Jun 1 08:51:05 SAST > >> 2012. > >> Fetching 4 metadata patches... done. > >> Applying metadata patches... done. > >> Fetching 0 metadata files... done. > >> Fetching 4180 patches.....10....20....30....40.... > >> > >> 4180 patches really !!! > >> > >> I run the above command almost everyday, so the most I have ever really > >> seen is 300 - 400 patches. But 4180 has got me attention. > >> > >> Thanks > >> Brent > > > > I may be mistaken but I would guess it has to do with the > > vulnerabilities addressed in OpenSSL in the 30/05/2012 update. > > > > I'm assuming authors have bumped their ports' revision numbers to force > > a rebuild, using the patched openssl lib. > > There might be a little of that, but most of the recent activity is > accounted for by > > * Numerous ports moving to the new OPTIONSng framework > > * Hundreds of PORTREVISION bumps after an update to graphics/png > > * Removal of old koffice ports and the import of the Calligra office > suite to replace it. > > Cheers, > > Matthew My system is FreeBSD 9.0 Release and the lst time I use Clang. It works very good but the lst problem was with Calligra which didn't built. As I red in /usr/ports/UPDATING I ran portmaster -r png- and there are so many ports which should be rebuild. My question is: Is it better (safer) to use gcc or try clang? Or is it better to not update png? Thanks in advance. Mitja -------- http://jpgmag.com/people/lumiwa