From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 16 11:32:44 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B403716A4B3; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 11:32:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from firecrest.mail.pas.earthlink.net (firecrest.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.121.247]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CFC643FF2; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 11:32:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tlambert2@mindspring.com) Received: from user-2ivfl3s.dialup.mindspring.com ([165.247.212.124] helo=mindspring.com) by firecrest.mail.pas.earthlink.net with asmtp (SSLv3:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1AACvO-0000WC-00; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 11:32:39 -0700 Message-ID: <3F8EE41D.F9E62438@mindspring.com> Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 11:31:57 -0700 From: Terry Lambert X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Max Laier References: <20031015112920.GA36404@nagual.pp.ru> <892502734.20031016143144@love2party.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ELNK-Trace: b1a02af9316fbb217a47c185c03b154d40683398e744b8a429cc99f05e01c6de8398d97e64a8b7ff350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c cc: Andrey Chernov cc: doc@freebsd.org cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: hiding e-mail adresses needed badly X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 18:32:44 -0000 Max Laier wrote: > Wednesday, October 15, 2003, 1:29:21 PM, you wrote: > AC> Due to increased activity of SPAM harvesters what are our plans to hide > AC> our addresses from public WWW? I mean all browseable mailing lists, > AC> FreeBSD site, CVS via WWW, PRs, ports and docs. > > OT: mail/procmail mail/relaydb mail/spamd mail/bmf ... etc. pp. > http://www.benzedrine.cx/relaydb.html > > So would you please stop whining and configure your procmail okay. > What you suggest is "Security Through Obscurity", which does not work! Cluebat: Neither does your solution, without having a static IP address and your own SMTP server with a full time broadband connection. -- Terry