From owner-cvs-all Tue Jul 9 12:10:21 2002 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18CC637B400; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 12:10:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.92.13.169]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1547143E3B; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 12:10:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.5/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g69JA6oi027924; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 12:10:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id g69JA6eZ027923; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 12:10:06 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 12:10:06 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" To: Robert Drehmel Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/compat/svr4 svr4_sysvec.c Message-ID: <20020709191006.GD27690@dragon.nuxi.com> Reply-To: obrien@FreeBSD.org Mail-Followup-To: David O'Brien , Robert Drehmel , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org References: <200207091459.g69ExRxg017714@freefall.freebsd.org> <20020709173323.GA24994@dragon.nuxi.com> <20020709204823.A31692@alpha.develop.ferrari.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020709204823.A31692@alpha.develop.ferrari.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 08:48:23PM +0200, Robert Drehmel wrote: > On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 10:33:23AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > > Also the SVR4 compat code will be used much more by our sparc64 platform > > than i386 one -- and there it will be used exclusively for Solaris > > binaries. > > That is true -- I will back it out. Do you agree that > brandelf(1) should then be changed to brand files to > ELFOSABI_SOLARIS when "SVR4" is specified as the type? Not really -- SVR4(ELFOSABI_SVR4) is a legal type. It is also the way of "un-branding". The change you made might be right, but I think we should think about it and make sure it is a change that is a Good Thing. There is Solaris-x86 and true-blue vanilla SVR4 on i386. So maybe we might need a sys/compat/solaris that uses most of the sys/compat/svr4 code. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message