From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 23 02:23:47 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48E4C16A41C; Mon, 23 May 2005 02:23:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from delphij@frontfree.net) Received: from tarsier.geekcn.org (tarsier.geekcn.org [210.51.165.229]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7F8043D49; Mon, 23 May 2005 02:23:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from delphij@frontfree.net) Received: from beastie.frontfree.net (unknown [219.239.99.7]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tarsier.geekcn.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8D5BEB3998; Mon, 23 May 2005 10:23:44 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost (localhost.frontfree.net [127.0.0.1]) by beastie.frontfree.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97613132CB5; Mon, 23 May 2005 10:23:39 +0800 (CST) Received: from beastie.frontfree.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (beastie.frontfree.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 44847-20; Mon, 23 May 2005 10:23:33 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.217.12.87] (unknown [61.135.152.194]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by beastie.frontfree.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8E8A131B4D; Mon, 23 May 2005 10:23:29 +0800 (CST) From: Xin LI To: Jeremie Le Hen In-Reply-To: <20050523003843.GO850@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> References: <20050522112612.GA37841@frontfree.net> <20050523003843.GO850@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-TchTgTtdfKZV1x6KRlTK" Organization: The FreeBSD Simplified Chinese Project Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 10:23:25 +0800 Message-Id: <1116815005.838.3.camel@spirit> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.1.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at frontfree.net Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, delphij@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [CALL FOR TESTERS] VESA High Resolution Console support from DragonFly X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: delphij@delphij.net List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 02:23:47 -0000 --=-TchTgTtdfKZV1x6KRlTK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Jeremie, =E5=9C=A8 2005-05-23=E4=B8=80=E7=9A=84 02:38 +0200=EF=BC=8CJeremie Le Hen= =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A [snip] > One question however : is it supposed to consume more CPU than classical > non-VESA text mode ? I think so, it should consume more CPU than classical text mode console since it draws characters, rather than giving the responsibility to the video card. A possible optimization would be to map the video card memory into the space. Cheers, --=20 Xin LI http://www.delphij.net/ --=-TchTgTtdfKZV1x6KRlTK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCkT6d/cVsHxFZiIoRAnwRAJ9EL+cFmkCkpbEPUz72WdOlwQMYpQCgi+qR O6jz0cIz/+0qGJWkG/Dn7yI= =KKFb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-TchTgTtdfKZV1x6KRlTK--