From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 14 07:20:50 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8281116A418 for ; Fri, 14 Sep 2007 07:20:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tv@solnet.ch) Received: from mail01.solnet.ch (mail01.solnet.ch [212.101.4.135]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49B0C13C46B for ; Fri, 14 Sep 2007 07:20:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tv@solnet.ch) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mail01.solnet.ch Received: from mail01.solnet.ch ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail01.solnet.ch [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id JDtZ8iXIaERE; Fri, 14 Sep 2007 07:04:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tom.local (home.bsdunix.ch [82.220.17.23]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail01.solnet.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F018C606; Fri, 14 Sep 2007 07:04:19 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <46EA3263.2060701@solnet.ch> Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 09:04:03 +0200 From: Thomas Vogt User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Macintosh/20070728) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alex Dupre References: <1091994189.20070913041709@arpanet.ru> <46E941D0.5020204@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <46E941D0.5020204@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 11:00:11 +0000 Cc: Alexander Sizov , current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: portsnap fetch bug or quality X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 07:20:50 -0000 Hello When does this happen? Our server is pretty busy every morning between 06.00 - 07.00 (UTC+2) because of so many parallels cvsup. We are also using portsnap for serveral servers without any problem at different time. JFYI: We are planning to setup a faster server at the end of next week. Regards, Thomas Alex Dupre schrieb: > Alexander Sizov ha scritto: > >> Looking up portsnap3.FreeBSD.org mirrors... none found. >> Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap3.FreeBSD.org... done. >> Fetching 1980 patches.....10....20....30....40 ... >> 1420....1430.... done. >> >> The number of fetching patches (1980) != number of fetched patches >> (143[8-9]). Why it happens? > > Does it happen only on portsnap3, right? >