From owner-freebsd-perl@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Feb 15 20:55:40 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-perl@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: perl@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8301E106566C;
	Tue, 15 Feb 2011 20:55:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from az@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org
	[IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5981B8FC0A;
	Tue, 15 Feb 2011 20:55:40 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p1FKtelq036928;
	Tue, 15 Feb 2011 20:55:40 GMT (envelope-from az@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from az@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p1FKteQI036924;
	Tue, 15 Feb 2011 20:55:40 GMT (envelope-from az)
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 20:55:40 GMT
Message-Id: <201102152055.p1FKteQI036924@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: milki@rescomp.berkeley.edu, az@FreeBSD.org, perl@FreeBSD.org
From: az@FreeBSD.org
Cc: 
Subject: Re: ports/154808: [PATCH] devel/p5-Package-Stash: update to 0.25
X-BeenThere: freebsd-perl@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: maintainer of a number of perl-related ports
	<freebsd-perl.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-perl>,
	<mailto:freebsd-perl-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-perl>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-perl@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-perl-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-perl>,
	<mailto:freebsd-perl-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 20:55:40 -0000

Synopsis: [PATCH] devel/p5-Package-Stash: update to 0.25

State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: az
State-Changed-When: Tue Feb 15 20:55:39 UTC 2011
State-Changed-Why: 
Since TEST_DEPENDS just variable and don't affect package build, don't
bump PORTREVISION.Also I think @dirrm almost same as @dirmrmtry by
functional. Thanks.

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=154808