Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2001 22:24:53 -0500 From: Will Andrews <will@physics.purdue.edu> To: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: port naming convention (was Re: isc-dhcp3) Message-ID: <20010314222452.J61859@ohm.physics.purdue.edu> In-Reply-To: <20010314190746.A4011@dragon.nuxi.com>; from obrien@FreeBSD.ORG on Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 07:07:46PM -0800 References: <200103130235.f2D2Z7I04680@gits.dyndns.org> <86u24x4upo.wl@cheerful.com> <20010313161136.H61859@ohm.physics.purdue.edu> <20010314190746.A4011@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--n/bWkD+C2XKluS7h Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 07:07:46PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote: > I fail to see a problem. If you want to use dhcp v3, you know it. IE, > it is beta software, some versions of it have problems. I fail to see > what is wrong with making sure you know you want version 3. Er, actually, I was defending your position that isc-dhcp/isc-dhcp3 should be so named in the package. It's all about the Latest link. --=20 wca --n/bWkD+C2XKluS7h Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.3 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE6sDYEF47idPgWcsURAvpMAJ0RIhGm6BtA7tKNlalb8cQ+8pAjbwCcCmUz 3JdHL+HpT3M1ZP7UBtdBBOQ= =znsv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --n/bWkD+C2XKluS7h-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010314222452.J61859>