From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org  Mon Feb 29 21:09:02 2016
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 486A3AB7802
 for <freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Mon, 29 Feb 2016 21:09:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@grem.de)
Received: from mail.grem.de (outcast.grem.de [213.239.217.27])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9B2BC2D5
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 21:09:01 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from freebsd@grem.de)
Received: (qmail 6416 invoked by uid 89); 29 Feb 2016 07:42:18 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.250.192?) (mg@grem.de@88.217.180.85)
 by mail.grem.de with ESMTPA; 29 Feb 2016 07:42:18 -0000
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Subject: Re: Completely unscientific poll: cfengine, puppet, other?
From: Michael Gmelin <freebsd@grem.de>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (13D15)
In-Reply-To: <CAG_PEey4TR+Zo=bq24HCmShYV1FZJpBiPAeegF5455oUjER5pg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 08:42:17 +0100
Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <7D8CBCD3-7EFB-46A9-9272-D07A5E72BEBE@grem.de>
References: <CAG_PEey4TR+Zo=bq24HCmShYV1FZJpBiPAeegF5455oUjER5pg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Chris Inacio <nacho319@gmail.com>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 21:09:02 -0000



> On 28 Feb 2016, at 20:11, Chris Inacio <nacho319@gmail.com> wrote:
>=20
> Hello all,
>=20
> I was considering adding some more support into some tooling/ports for
> FreeBSD and I thought it would probably be good to get configuration
> management support some thought.  So I can understand under certain Linux
> flavors (e.g. RedHat) that puppet is the de facto choice - since the
> distribution packager has chosen one.
>=20
> Is there a dominant one for FreeBSD?
>=20
> Happy if you would just reply with which one, if any, you use.  If you wan=
t
> to add more to the conversation, that's fine.  I understand the mailing
> list I posted this to and the likely audience - as I said I started think
> about this from adding more support into some ports.
>=20

We're using ansible to configure our FreeBSD machines (bare metal, bhyve, aw=
s, do) and jails on them.

- Michael=