Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 15:30:42 -0500 From: Laurence Berland <stuyman@confusion.net> To: bv@wjv.com Cc: Colin Campbell <sgcccdc@citec.qld.gov.au>, Christophe Prevotaux <c.prevotaux@hexanet.fr>, deepak@ai.net, questions@FreeBSD.ORG, isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: OC48 interface Message-ID: <3B1406F2.E4DCBD0F@confusion.net> References: <3B12CBBE.567B1A8D@confusion.net> <Pine.BSF.4.33.0105291136060.90725-100000@guru.citec.qld.gov.au> <20010529003126.C3968@wjv.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bill Vermillion wrote: > However in the US [I don't know abou elsewhere] there is no OC-1. > No OC-9, 18, 34, or 36. > > You will see OC-3, OC-12, OC-48 and OC-192. There is doubt > that the OC-768 will have wide distribution - that about 40Gbs - > because it's part of the SONET and TDM methods, it's not going to > to see much acceptance. > > Bill /me, who isn't as familiar with SONET as he'd like to be, doesn't understand why OC-768 will not be used when it becomes needed. What am I missing? TIA, -- Laurence Berland Northwestern '04 stuyman@confusion.net http://www.isp.northwestern.edu/~laurence "The world has turned and left me here" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3B1406F2.E4DCBD0F>