From owner-freebsd-current Wed Sep 30 19:21:12 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id TAA20584 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Wed, 30 Sep 1998 19:21:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from zippy.dyn.ml.org (pm3-14.ppp.wenet.net [206.15.85.14]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id TAA20549 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 1998 19:20:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garbanzo@hooked.net) Received: from localhost (garbanzo@localhost) by zippy.dyn.ml.org (8.9.1/8.8.8) with SMTP id TAA03728 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 1998 19:22:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garbanzo@hooked.net) X-Authentication-Warning: zippy.dyn.ml.org: garbanzo owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1998 19:22:30 -0700 (PDT) From: Alex X-Sender: garbanzo@zippy.dyn.ml.org To: current Subject: x11amp port Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I'm just kinda looking through this port, and I noticed (among other things), the x11amp port checks if the PORTOBJFORMAT==elf.. Now is it just me or should this port set the PORTOBJFORMAT to aout, as it's available soley as an a.out binary. This would also add the dependency on the a.out X11 libs, which would prevent some questions like, I've got X installed but x11amp can't find it. IMO. Thoughts? - alex | "Contrary to popular belief, penguins are not the salvation of modern | | technology. Neither do they throw parties for the urban proletariat." | | Powered by FreeBSD http://www.freebsd.org/ | To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message