From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sat Apr 12 21:49:36 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id VAA15421
          for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 12 Apr 1997 21:49:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA15416
          for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Sat, 12 Apr 1997 21:49:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id VAA16477; Sat, 12 Apr 1997 21:49:33 -0700 (PDT)
To: jbryant@tfs.net
cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: question about X.25 drivers 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 12 Apr 1997 17:43:50 CDT."
             <199704122243.RAA05171@argus> 
Date: Sat, 12 Apr 1997 21:49:33 -0700
Message-ID: <16474.860906973@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> may be..  but there are many many many hams around the world using
> AX.25 for packet radio operation...  i see uses for such a driver
> under FreeBSD...  The newest Linux kernels have recently realized the
> numbers and have done such a driver...

Well, OK.  So you're Mr. FreeBSD X.25 now? ;-)

Seriously, the biggest reason things "rot" in FreeBSD is that nobody
is actively maintaining them.  If you want to take on X.25 both
now and for the forseeable future, I see no problem with resurrecting
it.

					Jordan