From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 5 22:47:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBA11106564A for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 22:47:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ask@develooper.com) Received: from mbox1.develooper.com (mbox1.develooper.com [207.171.7.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 958658FC08 for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 22:47:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 17744 invoked from network); 5 Nov 2010 22:47:15 -0000 Received: from 71-95-204-2.static.mtpk.ca.charter.com (HELO ask-dev.bur.sol) (ask@mail.dev@71.95.204.2) by smtp.develooper.com with ESMTPA; 5 Nov 2010 22:47:15 -0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ask_Bj=F8rn_Hansen?= In-Reply-To: <4CD36BD0.4040409@tomjudge.com> Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 15:47:14 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <77F1671C-33AE-4AAB-8442-7653B00F7E04@develooper.com> References: <17903237-CBF6-4CC3-8CA3-29D9BB65538F@develooper.com> <4CD36BD0.4040409@tomjudge.com> To: Tom Judge X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "kernel: carp_input: received len 20 < sizeof(struct carp_header)" messages X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 22:47:15 -0000 On Nov 4, 2010, at 19:28, Tom Judge wrote: >> I checked that we don't have any overlapping vhid/vrid IDs. Any idea = for how to either just suppress the log message from the kernel or = getting it to log some more details so we can try to make the underlying = problem go away? >>=20 >=20 > Take a look at the following page: >=20 > http://www.tomjudge.com/index.php/FreeBSD/CARP_vs_VRRP >=20 > It contains a patch to change the CARP protocol ID to something that = is > not used so these messages go away. Hi Tom, Thank you for the reply. I was hoping we wouldn't have to rebuild the = kernel (doh) since we use a basically abandoned version of pfSense (the = pfSense team are for all their efforts and good work seemingly unable to = get a new release out the door). I agree that it was pretty dumb of the OpenBSD developers to just stomp = on another protocol ID for their (and ours in FreeBSD ...) = implementation. - ask --=20 http://develooper.com/ - http://askask.com/