From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Jul  5 18:10:58 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0DF32D2
 for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Sat,  5 Jul 2014 18:10:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from darkthrone.kvedulv.de (darkthrone.kvedulv.de
 [IPv6:2001:1578:400:101::2])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "darkthrone.kvedulv.de",
 Issuer "Gandi Standard SSL CA" (verified OK))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F44C2FA3
 for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Sat,  5 Jul 2014 18:10:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by darkthrone.kvedulv.de (Postfix, from userid 666)
 id 81EDB1E58; Sat,  5 Jul 2014 20:10:54 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2014 20:10:54 +0200
From: Michael Moll <kvedulv@kvedulv.de>
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Should 9.3 carry a warning about NEW_XORG
Message-ID: <20140705181054.GA36630@darkthrone.kvedulv.de>
References: <53B69B88.4060803@gmail.com>
 <E1X32XF-000PnU-QG@dilbert.ingresso.co.uk>
 <CAPyFy2BhARs+wxhOuP-09tcPgzerU00_ARy=o4OyKec9azTOkQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20140705103235.GB7680@rwpc15.gfn.riverwillow.net.au>
 <alpine.BSF.2.11.1407050455010.5138@wonkity.com>
 <20140705144740.ec111026afe7f65a4c87ba17@mimar.rs>
 <alpine.BSF.2.11.1407051025210.8233@wonkity.com>
 <alpine.BSF.2.11.1407051048510.8233@wonkity.com>
 <20140705195240.ed1c6d60f1fc94e5388659e0@mimar.rs>
 <20140705180635.GA3210@behemoth>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20140705180635.GA3210@behemoth>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Jul 2014 18:10:59 -0000

Hi,

On Sat, Jul 05, 2014 at 02:06:35PM -0400, Chris Nehren wrote:
> > > > More precisely, it says that Haswell processors with 4000-series
> > > > video are not yet supported.
> > Indeed, it is confusing. My processor is neither of i[357], but Xeon:
> > Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1245 V2 @ 3.40GHz (3392.37-MHz K8-class CPU)
> 
> That's *really* interesting, because I have a 
>  Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1245 v3 @ 3.40GHz (3400.07-MHz K8-class CPU)
> 
> and my X refuses to use anything other than VESA.

E3-1245 V2 is Ivy Bridge, E3-1245 v3 is Haswell.

Regards
-- 
Michael Moll