From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 21 12:09:27 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E3E51065670; Mon, 21 Apr 2008 12:09:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from conrads@cox.net) Received: from eastrmmtao106.cox.net (eastrmmtao106.cox.net [68.230.240.48]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11F288FC14; Mon, 21 Apr 2008 12:09:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from conrads@cox.net) Received: from eastrmimpo02.cox.net ([68.1.16.120]) by eastrmmtao106.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.01 201-2186-121-102-20070209) with ESMTP id <20080421120925.WHXD15722.eastrmmtao106.cox.net@eastrmimpo02.cox.net>; Mon, 21 Apr 2008 08:09:25 -0400 Received: from serene.no-ip.org ([72.204.149.54]) by eastrmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id GC9R1Z00G1AflDk02C9Rto; Mon, 21 Apr 2008 08:09:26 -0400 Received: from serene.no-ip.org (conrads@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by serene.no-ip.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m3LC9PDp002217; Mon, 21 Apr 2008 07:09:25 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from conrads@cox.net) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 07:09:25 -0500 From: "Conrad J. Sabatier" To: "Larry Rosenman" Message-ID: <20080421070925.4924ff42@serene.no-ip.org> In-Reply-To: <000001c8a28b$2e2994d0$8a7cbe70$@org> References: <82f916c90804180434l2f87842ar6398ec09d3e45c3c@mail.gmail.com> <20080418124557.GA40620@eos.sc1.parodius.com> <82f916c90804180706k3717ccf3u97b5c401a735d58c@mail.gmail.com> <010b01c8a163$b95133c0$2bf39b40$@org> <20080419202533.766c45f9@serene.no-ip.org> <000001c8a287$07037190$150a54b0$@org> <20080419204547.63d6773a@serene.no-ip.org> <000001c8a28b$2e2994d0$8a7cbe70$@org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.3.1 (GTK+ 2.12.9; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@freebsd.org, 'Jeremy Chadwick' , 'Kemian Dang' Subject: Re: Upgrading 'lsof-4.79K' to 'lsof-4.79,1' failed X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 12:09:27 -0000 On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 21:06:40 -0500 "Larry Rosenman" wrote: > Please do let me know. Still no good. Same exact error with a CURRENT built just this morning (Mon, Apr. 21, 7:00 am CDT). I noticed some conditional compilation stuff in one of the files, based on the version of FreeBSD being used. Perhaps we need some more of that? Thanks! > > -----Original Message----- > From: Conrad J. Sabatier [mailto:conrads@cox.net] > Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2008 8:46 PM > To: Larry Rosenman > Cc: 'Kemian Dang'; 'Jeremy Chadwick'; ports@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Upgrading 'lsof-4.79K' to 'lsof-4.79,1' failed > > On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 20:36:55 -0500 > "Larry Rosenman" wrote: > > > Do you have a Current 8-Current? What is the date of your sources? > > It's a pretty current Current. :-) > > FreeBSD serene.no-ip.org 8.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT #0: Fri Apr 18 > 01:11:50 CDT 2008 root@serene.no-ip.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CUSTOM > amd64 > > In the process now of upgrading sources again and rebuilding > world/kernel. We'll see what happens. > > The version of lsof I have in ports is 4.79, the final "release" > version (minus any of the versioning suffix letters). > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Conrad J. Sabatier [mailto:conrads@cox.net] > > Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2008 8:26 PM > > To: Larry Rosenman > > Cc: 'Kemian Dang'; 'Jeremy Chadwick'; ports@freebsd.org > > Subject: Re: Upgrading 'lsof-4.79K' to 'lsof-4.79,1' failed > > > > On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 09:51:36 -0500 > > "Larry Rosenman" wrote: > > > > > You need to upgrade your system sources. The way the developers > > > have implemented some locking changes makes it hard for the lsof > > > configure script to do the right thing. > > > > > > Please upgrade to current RELENG_7, and all should be fine with the > > > 4.79,1 port. > > > > > > Thanks! > > > Larry Rosenman > > > sysutils/lsof maintainer. > > > > The lsof upgrade fails in a slightly different manner under 8-CURRENT: > > > > cc -pipe -Wno-error -fno-strict-aliasing -Wno-error > > -DHASEFFNLINK=i_effnlink -D HASF_VNODE -DHASCPUMASK_T -DHASSBSTATE > > -DHAS_KVM_VNODE -DHAS_UFS1_2 -DHAS_NO_SI_ UDEV -DHAS_SI_PRIV > > -DHAS_SYS_SX_H -DHAS_LOCKF_ENTRY -DFREEBSDV=8000 -DHASFDESCFS=2 > > -DHASPSEUDOFS -DHASNULLFS -DHASIPv6 -DHAS_STRFTIME > > -DLSOF_VSTR=\"8.0-CURRENT\ " -I/usr/src/sys -O2 -c dnode.c > > dnode.c: In function 'process_node': > > dnode.c:760: error: 'struct inode' has no member named 'i_lockf' > > dnode.c:761: error: 'struct inode' has no member named 'i_lockf' > > *** Error code 1 > > > > So...good to go with RELENG_7, but not HEAD? Hmmm. > -- Every man thinks God is on his side. The rich and powerful know he is. -- Jean Anouilh, French dramatist and playwright