From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 15 05:30:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CE9816A407 for ; Fri, 15 Sep 2006 05:30:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F0EE43D5D for ; Fri, 15 Sep 2006 05:30:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k8F5UUq1023549 for ; Fri, 15 Sep 2006 05:30:30 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k8F5UUhf023548; Fri, 15 Sep 2006 05:30:30 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 05:30:30 GMT Message-Id: <200609150530.k8F5UUhf023548@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Maxim Konovalov Cc: Subject: Re: bin/100443 : awk(1) dies with SIGBUS when processing INDEX-6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Maxim Konovalov List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 05:30:31 -0000 The following reply was made to PR bin/100443; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Maxim Konovalov To: "Devon H. O'Dell" Cc: Ruslan Ermilov , bug-followup@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bin/100443 : awk(1) dies with SIGBUS when processing INDEX-6 Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 09:20:20 +0400 (MSD) On Thu, 14 Sep 2006, 19:15-0400, Devon H. O'Dell wrote: > Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 09:40:24PM +0000, Devon H. O'Dell wrote: > [snip] > > > Do we need to send this upstream? > > > > > Yes, of course. > > I sent an email to BWK a couple hours ago -- hopefully he'll get it > soon :) Where did you send it? There is an annoing misfeature described in bin/86514 the patch for which would be nice to incorporate to the upstream. I see patches in bin/72370 too. -- Maxim Konovalov