From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue Nov  9  4: 5:39 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from verdi.nethelp.no (verdi.nethelp.no [158.36.41.162])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B79DD14FFF
	for <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue,  9 Nov 1999 04:05:26 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from sthaug@nethelp.no)
Received: (qmail 58332 invoked by uid 1001); 9 Nov 1999 12:05:25 +0000 (GMT)
To: jhay@mikom.csir.co.za
Cc: phk@critter.freebsd.dk, shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp,
	freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Should jail treat ip-number?
From: sthaug@nethelp.no
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 9 Nov 1999 09:52:45 +0200 (SAT)"
References: <199911090752.JAA89881@zibbi.mikom.csir.co.za>
X-Mailer: Mew version 1.05+ on Emacs 19.34.2
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Tue, 09 Nov 1999 13:05:25 +0100
Message-ID: <58330.942149125@verdi.nethelp.no>
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> > I agree, *IF* IPv6 ever becomes a reality, we will look at this.
> 
> So when will you consider that it became a reality? :-) Or am I just
> dreaming that some operating systems and routers ship with IPv6 and
> that IANA, ARIN, APNIC and RIPE are dishing out IPv6 addresses and
> that we are in the process of getting Kame integrated into FreeBSD? :-)

When there are several Internet Exchange points with routers using
non-tunneled IPv6, exchanging significant traffic?

Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message