From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Apr  7 04:37:11 2006
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org
Delivered-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A8F916A402;
	Fri,  7 Apr 2006 04:37:11 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com)
Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAA4C43D48;
	Fri,  7 Apr 2006 04:37:10 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com)
Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502)
	id 4A571539C; Thu,  6 Apr 2006 23:37:10 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 23:37:10 -0500
To: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@FreeBSD.org>
Message-ID: <20060407043710.GA27402@soaustin.net>
References: <200604070008.k370815D002659@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<20060407042854.GB27150@soaustin.net>
	<1144384388.23833.0.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1144384388.23833.0.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon)
Cc: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org,
	cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/portlint Makefile
X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree <cvs-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ports>,
	<mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ports>,
	<mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2006 04:37:11 -0000

On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 12:33:08AM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> I thought we were waiting for Ade's libtool patch was was already
> committed.  I have seen numerous PRs about REINPLACE since then as well
> as many relevant commits.  Therefore, I saw no problem in doing
> portlint.

The idea I had was to do the USE_REINPLACE things as a small number of
commits sweeping the entire tree, rather than N commits.  I would think
the commits are OK if you are already committing a PR anyway.  I would
also like to see as many of the 'update'-style PRs committed before we
do that sweep, because after that the patches in many of those PRs are
probably going to become stale.

mcl