Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2024 20:43:24 +0200 From: Mario Marietto <marietto2008@gmail.com> To: Chris Moerz <freebsd@ny-central.org> Cc: FreeBSD Virtualization Mailing List <freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: OS Images(Linux/etc) in ports tree Message-ID: <CA%2B1FSigSqO3j1EnHvr2aR%2Bks9WbC53Oyswspvfj9j2GDOG019Q@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <d4156558-9a22-092e-c984-883710fa0ae9@ny-central.org> References: <CAD6yh%2BM_Z_HNcPavt4_TvGn9QhWPX8Q2qU12em3bUkfNXS1WSA@mail.gmail.com> <28dd6abb-5868-e42a-c385-37e72653ba2d@ny-central.org> <bur66nu6ytk7n5nnriwjy2oddrczsk3wse3zjvv2g6giaiohbl@xpbsmba6kp47> <CA%2B1FSii3a_%2BH43-8VkxDT%2BpW_tM9b93cW8zYx6bLTmWGmz8heQ@mail.gmail.com> <d4156558-9a22-092e-c984-883710fa0ae9@ny-central.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] This could be the project that you are interested in : https://github.com/quickemu-project/quickemu In your case,it could be called quick bhyve. So let's get started. I'm also interested in collaborating. Il sab 29 giu 2024, 19:49 Chris Moerz <freebsd@ny-central.org> ha scritto: > > > On Sat, 29 Jun 2024, Mario Marietto wrote: > > > I think that it may be possible to put only the VM config files on the > ports,not necessarily heavy image files. > > > > You're all making a valid point; I second that - I read the original post > as if we're talking about scripts that download images from somewhere > else. May have jumped to conclusions. > > We can probably all agree: OS images do not belong into the ports tree. > Porting scripts that handle OS image creation or downloading them from > some public repository though would certainly be fine. > > chris > > [-- Attachment #2 --] <div dir="auto"><div style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12.8px" dir="auto">This could be the project that you are interested in :<br></div><div style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12.8px" dir="auto"><br></div><div style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12.8px" dir="auto"><a href="https://github.com/quickemu-project/quickemu" style="text-decoration-line:none;color:rgb(66,133,244)">https://github.com/quickemu-project/quickemu</a></div><div style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12.8px" dir="auto"><br></div><div style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12.8px" dir="auto">In your case,it could be called quick bhyve. So let's get started. I'm also interested in collaborating.</div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">Il sab 29 giu 2024, 19:49 Chris Moerz <<a href="mailto:freebsd@ny-central.org">freebsd@ny-central.org</a>> ha scritto:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br> <br> On Sat, 29 Jun 2024, Mario Marietto wrote:<br> <br> > I think that it may be possible to put only the VM config files on the ports,not necessarily heavy image files.<br> ><br> <br> You're all making a valid point; I second that - I read the original post<br> as if we're talking about scripts that download images from somewhere<br> else. May have jumped to conclusions.<br> <br> We can probably all agree: OS images do not belong into the ports tree.<br> Porting scripts that handle OS image creation or downloading them from<br> some public repository though would certainly be fine.<br> <br> chris<br> <br> </blockquote></div>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CA%2B1FSigSqO3j1EnHvr2aR%2Bks9WbC53Oyswspvfj9j2GDOG019Q>