From owner-freebsd-commit Fri Jun 23 09:24:46 1995 Return-Path: commit-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id JAA14575 for commit-outgoing; Fri, 23 Jun 1995 09:24:46 -0700 Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id JAA14561 for cvs-usrbin-outgoing; Fri, 23 Jun 1995 09:24:39 -0700 Received: (from wpaul@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id JAA14551 ; Fri, 23 Jun 1995 09:24:36 -0700 Date: Fri, 23 Jun 1995 09:24:36 -0700 From: Bill Paul Message-Id: <199506231624.JAA14551@freefall.cdrom.com> To: CVS-commiters, cvs-usrbin Subject: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/chpass table.c Sender: commit-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk wpaul 95/06/23 09:24:35 Modified: usr.bin/chpass table.c Log: Somewhere along the line, somebody decided to make the 'full name' field restricted. Am I the only one who sees the absurdity of having chfn be a link to chpass, and then denying users permission to use chpass to change their full names? Of course, chpass has a much more severe bug in it, which is that it allows users to change their password database info without first asking them for their password. I hope to fix this at some point so that I can merge ypchpass, ypchfn, ypchsh and chpass into one program (password authentication is required for changing NIS data).