Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 25 Nov 2001 23:21:02 +0000
From:      Ian Dowse <iedowse@maths.tcd.ie>
To:        Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Cc:        cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/tail forward.c 
Message-ID:   <200111252321.aa42920@salmon.maths.tcd.ie>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 25 Nov 2001 14:45:40 PST." <20011125144540.A93369@xor.obsecurity.org> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20011125144540.A93369@xor.obsecurity.org>, Kris Kennaway writes:
>
>Hmm, this strikes me as a bit nasty...ideally you shouldn't have to
>poll for any status changes in a kqueue world.  Is there an easy way
>kq could be improved to handle this?

I guess tail could add a kevent for every component in the specified
path including expanded symlinks (and resort to polling if any were
on filesystems that don't support kqueue). I think that would just
over-complicate tail for very little real gain. Note that tail -f
doesn't use polling; it's only when you explicitly tell tail that
the path might change by specifying "-F" that it gets used. I
suppose for -F, the timeout could be increased to 5 or 10 seconds
also because simple renames within the same directory are noticed
immediately.

Ian

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi? <200111252321.aa42920>