From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 18 22:07:50 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA2E9EDF; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 22:07:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mckusick@mckusick.com) Received: from chez.mckusick.com (chez.mckusick.com [IPv6:2001:5a8:4:7e72:4a5b:39ff:fe12:452]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3F36294F; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 22:07:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from chez.mckusick.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chez.mckusick.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id r8IM7fAs063113; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 15:07:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mckusick@chez.mckusick.com) Message-Id: <201309182207.r8IM7fAs063113@chez.mckusick.com> To: "Teske, Devin" Subject: Re: kern/182181: [ufs] Leakage of vnode references (race condition?) In-reply-to: <201309182000.r8IK01Vc080805@freefall.freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 15:07:41 -0700 From: Kirk McKusick Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, bug-followup@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 22:07:50 -0000 > Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 20:00:01 GMT > To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org > From: "Teske, Devin" > Subject: Re: kern/182181: [ufs] Leakage of vnode references (race condition?) > > The following reply was made to PR kern/182181; it has been noted by GNATS. > > From: "Teske, Devin" > To: "bug-followup@FreeBSD.org" , > "redrat@mail.ru" > > Cc: "Teske, Devin" > Subject: Re: kern/182181: [ufs] Leakage of vnode references (race condition?) > Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 19:57:52 +0000 > > When you say you applied r253998 to 8-RELEASE, which branch? > I see that the equivalent one-line change introduced by r253998 has > been in stable/8 for 2 years 4 months (meaning 8.3-R and later have > the change you're talking about). > > Could you clarify please? > -- > Devin My fat-fingered mistake. I should have said that it was MFC'ed to 9-RELEASE. Specifically -r255104 was the MFC from current to 9-stable and -r255231 was MFS to releng9.2 so that it will be in the 9.2 release. Sorry for the confusion. Kirk McKusick