Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2023 15:38:59 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 274433] ports-mgmt/poudriere: broken option logic after introducing portconfig Message-ID: <bug-274433-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D274433 Bug ID: 274433 Summary: ports-mgmt/poudriere: broken option logic after introducing portconfig Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Some People Priority: --- Component: Individual Port(s) Assignee: bdrewery@FreeBSD.org Reporter: vsasjason@gmail.com CC: bapt@FreeBSD.org, madpilot@FreeBSD.org Flags: maintainer-feedback?(bdrewery@FreeBSD.org) Assignee: bdrewery@FreeBSD.org 0cae7336b7c9fcfceac895ee6b9104e01d6a04d1 and next 5 commits introduced some mess in options and this is not fixed at the moment of creating this PR: * PORTCONFIG option says "install _dialog4ports_ ..." in its description; * Actual support for dialog4ports is removed in port options, but still available in files/patch-portconfig. According to that patch, it was meant = to _add_ portconfig support, not _replace_ dialog4ports with it (or the patch = is incorrect). I believe following is the right way: * restore original DIALOG4PORTS option * add PORTCONFIG option and set correct description * make both options grouped (according to code, RADIO isn't required as multiselect will work) * set whatever option as default, but allow those who used DIALOG4PORTS to continue that --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-274433-7788>