Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 14:46:31 -0400 From: Adam Jimerson <vendion@gmail.com> To: Kurt Jaeger <pi@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Any ports committers able to review a new port request Message-ID: <CABGpj5CkX2_xwb_eWLErB3PJyp0FPfiCM1v0Z-Xjg0YNmc1Jhg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20200810184258.GF3539@home.opsec.eu> References: <3004707.bT80LyP3VS@heimdall> <20200810162224.GE3539@home.opsec.eu> <20200810184258.GF3539@home.opsec.eu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, Yes I will be fixing that in a new patch. The yadm tool has seen a new update just the other day so I'll merge this patch and the update into one ticket and skip messing with having to bump the PORTREVISION for that port. On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 2:43 PM Kurt Jaeger <pi@freebsd.org> wrote: > Hi! > > > > A few months ago I opened a bug report to add a new port > textproc/py-j2cli > > > (https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245783) that I > will be the > > > maintainer of. This will be an optional runtime dependency of > sysutils/yadm > > > to allow for Jinja2 template files. > > > > Committed, thanks! > > Btw, will you fix the patch in > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245593 > > ? > > -- > pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 Now what ? >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CABGpj5CkX2_xwb_eWLErB3PJyp0FPfiCM1v0Z-Xjg0YNmc1Jhg>