From owner-freebsd-alpha Thu Feb 24 12:14:47 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Received: from feral.com (feral.com [192.67.166.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4892E37B76D for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 12:14:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mjacob@feral.com) Received: from beppo.feral.com (beppo [192.67.166.79]) by feral.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA02943; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 12:14:40 -0800 Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2000 12:14:39 -0800 (PST) From: Matthew Jacob Reply-To: mjacob@feral.com To: Andrew Gallatin Cc: freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: problems with Qlogic SCSI combo card In-Reply-To: <14517.30581.883054.17781@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, 24 Feb 2000, Andrew Gallatin wrote: > > Matthew Jacob writes: > > > > > > Matthew Jacob writes: > > > > > > > > Is there any reason why we shouldn't allow only memory mapping > > > > if I/O mapping is broken? > > > > > > > > > > That's a great idea -- how do we tell? > > > > Ah! do I detect a pink of irony? :-) > > No.. I was serious, but in a hurry. I was wondering how one tells if > a ppb doesn't deal with i/o space access behind it. Is there a > standard value you get back when you read the i/o base & i/o limit > registers in config space, or is there some other way to tell, or do > we need a quirk for 21050s, etc.. Uh, I'd have to admit I would have to look at the PCI spec again to know this... but I can assure you that we'll need quirks no matter what. -matt To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message