From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 22 21:16:51 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [69.147.83.53]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06DC7106564A; Sun, 22 Jul 2012 21:16:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from opti.dougb.net (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE281158E46; Sun, 22 Jul 2012 21:16:25 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <500C6DA9.1070305@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2012 14:16:25 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120621 Thunderbird/13.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeremy Messenger References: <15617903.FBMimp13fy@mocha.verizon.net> <2193820.CL19acAFmS@mocha.verizon.net> <500B1953.10809@FreeBSD.org> <500B8811.9090609@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.2 OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Scot Hetzel , kde@freebsd.org, ruby@freebsd.org, Edwin Groothuis , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, gnome@freebsd.org, "Jason E. Hale" Subject: Re: How to remove erroneous deps from pkgng X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2012 21:16:51 -0000 On 07/22/2012 07:51, Jeremy Messenger wrote: > You need to start to respect the people's work and plan, Doug. Also I > am part of team that maintaining the bsd.gnome.mk. Yes it will be > re-add if anyone plan to remove it, because I already have planned add > the :build/:run feature in the bsd.gnome.mk that the without :* will > be both build/run time dependency. It is impossible for me to not > re-add it. It is not going to be long because I already have function > :build/:run in the bsd.mate.mk (was repocopied from bsd.gnome.mk) > available. > > The only thing that I don't plan is to chase thousands of port to have > the 'pkgconfig;build'. If anyone want to take up this task is cool > with me. So what you're saying is that in spite of the fact that the community has identified a bug that it wants to fix, a bug which was added by the team maintaining bsd.gnome.mk, that you are refusing to modify your patch to handle the bug; but instead are demanding your right to reintroduce the bug, and then further demanding the right to not fix it after the patch is in? And furthermore, you're refusing to even look at the other dependencies which are handled by bsd.gnome.mk to see if similar bugs were introduced *by your team*, but you're happy to let everyone else sort out the problems in thousands of ports for you. And you want me to respect that? -- Change is hard.