From owner-freebsd-current Mon Dec 30 20:27:58 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 707D737B401 for ; Mon, 30 Dec 2002 20:27:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from citusc.usc.edu (citusc.usc.edu [128.125.38.123]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A88C43EB2 for ; Mon, 30 Dec 2002 20:27:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@citusc.usc.edu) Received: (from kris@localhost) by citusc.usc.edu (8.11.6/8.11.2) id gBV4Rbh30751; Mon, 30 Dec 2002 20:27:37 -0800 Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2002 20:27:37 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Brent Verner Cc: Kris Kennaway , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: No panics on the bento cluster! Message-ID: <20021230202737.C30594@citusc.usc.edu> References: <20021230185352.A30095@citusc.usc.edu> <20021231031932.GA95923@rcfile.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="WplhKdTI2c8ulnbP" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20021231031932.GA95923@rcfile.org>; from brent@rcfile.org on Mon, Dec 30, 2002 at 10:19:32PM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --WplhKdTI2c8ulnbP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Dec 30, 2002 at 10:19:32PM -0500, Brent Verner wrote: > [2002-12-30 18:53] Kris Kennaway said: > | I just wanted to share the good news that since updating to matt's > | vmspace fix (over a week ago), there have been no panics on the bento > | cluster (21 machines of 3 architectures running 5.0-RC, under constant > | heavy load, and despite the close proximity of Peter Wemm in the > | datacenter for a few hours). This is quite unusual, and it means that > | either 5.0 is shaping up well for the release, or the whole house of > | cards is about to come crashing down :-) >=20 > Speaking of bento... >=20 > I noticed that a nice artifact of the bento ports test/build system > are the fresh port packages. Is it acceptable to use that machine > (http://bento.freebsd.org) as PACKAGESITE for pkg_add? I've done it > a few times, but don't want to (ab)use it if the packages are not > there for general package installation use. It's fine when it works, which is most of the time except when it doesn't :-) (e.g. if the build has been interrupted, fails catastrophically, or produces broken packages) Kris --WplhKdTI2c8ulnbP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE+ERy5Wry0BWjoQKURAqGtAKCYc1MDzruw+lxZoimmWW9VH4uO2wCguf5m qJCsyA0cwgZOjN3wyVB8KuU= =b4bV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --WplhKdTI2c8ulnbP-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message