From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 8 14:09:42 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7654B16A4CF for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2004 14:09:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 21322530218.direct.eti.at (21322530218.direct.eti.at [213.225.30.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7390243D72 for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2004 14:09:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tilman@arved.at) Received: from huckfinn-wi0.arved.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i38L9es3079952; Thu, 8 Apr 2004 23:09:40 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from tilman@arved.at) Received: (from tilman@localhost) by huckfinn-wi0.arved.de (8.12.11/8.12.6/Submit) id i38L9eHr079951; Thu, 8 Apr 2004 23:09:40 +0200 (CEST) X-Authentication-Warning: huckfinn-wi0.arved.de: tilman set sender to tilman@arved.at using -f Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2004 23:09:40 +0200 From: Tilman Linneweh To: Jason Lixfeld Message-ID: <20040408210939.GA79932@arved.at> References: <1136DB62-8983-11D8-9A25-000A95989E4A@lixfeld.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1136DB62-8983-11D8-9A25-000A95989E4A@lixfeld.ca> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Anyone using AMD64 + FreeBSD + openldap? (was: openldap-2.1.27 - X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2004 21:09:42 -0000 * Jason Lixfeld [Do, 08 Apr 2004 at 19:35 GMT]: >> I use OpenLDAP 2.2/back-bdb/bdb 4.2.52+patches on RELENG_4. >> I don't see such problems. I just now starting to toy with >> RELENG_5_2. > > What hardware are you using? I can't run BDB because of AMD64 issues > with fast mutexes so I'm using ldbm instead. > >> I also note that I haven't had any problems using db_recover >> to recover from hard crashes. > > Again, this would be fine if I could run BDB. Matthias Andree suggested, a possible workaround to the problems with the fast mutexes may be to add --with-mutex=x86/gcc-assembly to the CONFIGURE_ARGS. Can you test, if this fixes your problems? regards tilman