From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 12 15:58:41 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9726A9CE; Sat, 12 Oct 2013 15:58:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Devin.Teske@fisglobal.com) Received: from mx1.fisglobal.com (mx1.fisglobal.com [199.200.24.190]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E85723F5; Sat, 12 Oct 2013 15:58:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.fisglobal.com ([10.132.206.16]) by ltcfislmsgpa01.fnfis.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r9CFweCB009492 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Sat, 12 Oct 2013 10:58:40 -0500 Received: from LTCFISWMSGMB21.FNFIS.com ([169.254.1.103]) by LTCFISWMSGHT05.FNFIS.com ([10.132.206.16]) with mapi id 14.02.0309.002; Sat, 12 Oct 2013 10:58:28 -0500 From: "Teske, Devin" To: Nathan Whitehorn Subject: Re: svn commit: r256343 - in head/usr.sbin/bsdinstall: . scripts Thread-Topic: svn commit: r256343 - in head/usr.sbin/bsdinstall: . scripts Thread-Index: AQHOx2PjW1uGCLtcyE2zUcTOTrV8Ig== Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2013 15:58:27 +0000 Message-ID: <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D720FC5BB95@LTCFISWMSGMB21.FNFIS.com> References: <201310112041.r9BKfZeT002056@svn.freebsd.org> <5258F9B3.7030101@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <5258F9B3.7030101@freebsd.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.132.253.121] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <5A6AE30361AAC0468AC5F7B2EA23D851@fisglobal.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.10.8794, 1.0.431, 0.0.0000 definitions=2013-10-12_01:2013-10-11,2013-10-12,1970-01-01 signatures=0 Cc: "svn-src-head@freebsd.org" , "svn-src-all@freebsd.org" , Devin Teske , "src-committers@freebsd.org" , "Teske, Devin" X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Devin Teske List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2013 15:58:41 -0000 On Oct 12, 2013, at 12:26 AM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > On 10/11/13 22:41, Devin Teske wrote: >> Author: dteske >> Date: Fri Oct 11 20:41:35 2013 >> New Revision: 256343 >> URL: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=3Dhttp://svnweb.freebsd.= org/changeset/base/256343&k=3D%2FbkpAUdJWZuiTILCq%2FFnQg%3D%3D%0A&r=3DMrjs6= vR4%2Faj2Ns9%2FssHJjg%3D%3D%0A&m=3DLDzuPpXPP4D5BzfISZjw%2BXitYn4aKVzfXzcrmM= NFo2U%3D%0A&s=3D3d0963d9c497f7bad0918888032ca62844580612dc48ab3a8a6768fe640= c365b >>=20 >> Log: >> Add zfsboot module as an option for automatic configuration. Default is >> to run interactively but it can be scripted too (optinally completely >> non-interactive). Currently supports GELI and all ZFS vdev types. Also >> performs validation on selections/settings providing error messages if >> necessary, explaining (in plain language) what the issue is. Currently >> the auto partitioning of naked disks only supports GPT and MBR (VTOC8 >> pending for sparc64), so is only available for i386/amd64 install. >>=20 >> Submitted by: Allan Jude , myself >> Reviewed by: Allan Jude >> Approved by: re (glebius) >=20 > Hi Devin -- >=20 > As was discussed on the mailing list, this patch still has some issues > that need to be resolved, Can you kindly provide links? I'm crawling through the mailing lists and not finding anything for the October, (current, stable, sysinstall, ... ?? = others?) Do I need to be looking back in September? I wouldn't think so, because that bit wasn't even in our development tree until October 1st: http://druidbsd.cvs.sf.net/viewvc/druidbsd/bsdinstall_zfs/usr.sbin%3A%3Absd= config%3A%3Ashare%3A%3Adevice.subr.patch?revision=3D1.1&view=3Dmarkup So there couldn't have been any discussion on it before then. So I'm just n= ot able to find the mailing lists where all the action is that they're discuss= ing it. Would be nice to find where the action is, so I could participate. > for example the use of camcontrol > unconditionally even when the disks may not be CAM Allan Adds: 9.2 should have all disks listed in camcontrol, so it shouldn't be an issue And: I think the only systems without cam based disks are old 8.x - we're only t= argeting 10 anyway. I tend to agree with those statements. > and destruction of > existing sub-partitioning for MBR disks. I think we both (Allan and I) actually responded directly to you on this on= e. We have code that handles that. It's in there. --=20 Devin _____________ The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidentia= l. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message an= d all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any ma= nner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware= that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and revie= w by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you.