From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 16 22:12:56 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 234AF16A4CE for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 22:12:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from srv1.cosmo-project.de (srv1.cosmo-project.de [213.83.6.106]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F40843D1F for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 22:12:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: from cicely5.cicely.de (cicely5.cicely.de [IPv6:3ffe:400:8d0:301:200:92ff:fe9b:20e7]) (authenticated bits=0) i2H6AGUS087384 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=OK); Wed, 17 Mar 2004 07:10:21 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: from cicely12.cicely.de (cicely12.cicely.de [IPv6:3ffe:400:8d0:301::12]) by cicely5.cicely.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2H69rhn079224 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 17 Mar 2004 07:09:53 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: from cicely12.cicely.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cicely12.cicely.de (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i2H69q5U007760; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 07:09:52 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: (from ticso@localhost) by cicely12.cicely.de (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i2H69q34007759; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 07:09:52 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso) Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 07:09:52 +0100 From: Bernd Walter To: Harald Schmalzbauer Message-ID: <20040317060951.GF4991@cicely12.cicely.de> References: <200403162024.31782.h@schmalzbauer.de> <200403162036.04418.h@schmalzbauer.de> <20040316233525.GD4991@cicely12.cicely.de> <200403170653.34932.h@schmalzbauer.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <200403170653.34932.h@schmalzbauer.de> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD cicely12.cicely.de 5.2-CURRENT alpha User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.61 X-Spam-Report: * -4.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on cicely5.cicely.de cc: Bernd Walter cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: ticso@cicely.de cc: "Erik U." Subject: Re: Mysterious 60min reboot on net4501 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: ticso@cicely.de List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 06:12:56 -0000 On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 06:53:30AM +0100, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 17. März 2004 00:35 schrieb Bernd Walter: > > On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 08:35:58PM +0100, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: > > > Am Dienstag, 16. März 2004 20:29 schrieb Erik U.: > > > > Maybe something in the crontab that runs hourly and crashes your > > > > system. > > > > > > Cron doesn't run at all. > > > > > > If it only was that simple..... > > > > Maybe a too small power supply - current utilizes the CPU a bit more > > and therefor requires more power. > > At least -current never gave me such problems with soekris boards. > > You are right, ther also was a problem with the power supply but I had > replaced the old one by a 6V/2A model. I'm astonished about the 60 min > interval. What bug could caus this? Today I'll revert all the "newies" like > crypto hw/support aso. Why do you think it's a bug? Maybe some intervall loads the CPU more than the remaining time. The elan520 has a very load dependend power consumption. I don't know what happens special at 60min uptime - maybe something simple like named cache garbadge collection or so. The hifn chip consume a lot of power independend of beeing used or not, so removing kernel support for it won't help much. -- B.Walter BWCT http://www.bwct.de ticso@bwct.de info@bwct.de