From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 5 19:07:23 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 911551065672 for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2011 19:07:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from victordetoni@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qw0-f54.google.com (mail-qw0-f54.google.com [209.85.216.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 507B58FC1F for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2011 19:07:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qwc9 with SMTP id 9so2278378qwc.13 for ; Fri, 05 Aug 2011 12:07:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=kSS+/o7aKCXPPId4UbUPqZio4wxz/pbkNmeQr4726bg=; b=DM4uVOaDucWUzkANYl86o9uINsz9PBmHfATG4WrBM4nonKFdVhS2x3gHMoSox75GiJ 25CWhIOVSEQVonkHYHVrV6dN3tBGXVWMt5lMCZ+IapjfsCJ5ubo4zIBWuEp/RNPLD57i EgHb/3ko91pO0gFBeq94vpMVKFwZZ5FWLl9DM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.75.10 with SMTP id w10mr2050638qcj.149.1312571242616; Fri, 05 Aug 2011 12:07:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.81.213 with HTTP; Fri, 5 Aug 2011 12:07:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20110805002732.GA5340@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> References: <20110805002732.GA5340@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2011 16:07:22 -0300 Message-ID: From: Victor Detoni To: Luigi Rizzo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: High Network Perfomance X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2011 19:07:23 -0000 Hi Luigi, Thanks for reply. That's great solution :) Will be integrated with pf or is it? Thanks, Victor On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 9:27 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 08:39:17PM -0300, Victor Detoni wrote: > > Hi Guys, > > > > I'm trying tunning a FreeBSD 8.2 to high perfomance network with pf. My > > server configuration is: > > > > Dell 1950 > > CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU 5130 @ 2.00GHz (1995.03-MHz > K8-class > > CPU) > > 4 x CPU > > 2 NIC ( > 1 NIC (em0: ) > > > > I want to reach the high processing of packets per second and use pf as > > synproxy and we still processor to handle others packets or flows. > > > > I know that em drivers has MULTI_QUEUE implementation that helps high > > performance for Intel drivers, but I couldn't see more information about. > We > > can reached 500k pps, but no more traffic was processed by this > interface. > > > > I've already enabled net.isr.direct but with Intel Drivers does not work > and > > the most processors are in System instead of Interrupts, why? When I > enable > > net.isr.direct the processing is balanced for on CPU in system and > another > > in interrupt and I reached 1M pps, but the total perfomance is down, the > > load grow up too fast. > > > > I've changed some parameter in sysctl for intel drivers, but it doesn't > have > > effect. > > > > Someone know what I can do to reach more packets performance? I want to > use > > this FreeBSD as a router/firewall only. > > if you feel like doing a bit of coding yourself, you could try netmap > > http://info.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/netmap/ > > cheers > luigi > > > Thanks, > > Victor > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >