From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 1 20:42:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F6091065676 for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 20:42:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dudu@dudu.ro) Received: from mail-gw0-f54.google.com (mail-gw0-f54.google.com [74.125.83.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D33D08FC12 for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 20:42:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gwaa20 with SMTP id a20so222964gwa.13 for ; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 13:42:50 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.90.33.20 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 13:15:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201004011527.o31FRffp053530@lurza.secnetix.de> References: <201003251843.36898.lobo@bsd.com.br> <201004011527.o31FRffp053530@lurza.secnetix.de> From: Vlad Galu Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 23:15:13 +0300 Received: by 10.91.51.2 with SMTP id d2mr1975164agk.31.1270152933433; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 13:15:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Subject: Re: Compiling kernel with gcc43 [SOLVED] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2010 20:42:52 -0000 On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 6:27 PM, Oliver Fromme wrot= e: > Mario Lobo wrote: > =A0> [...] > =A0> It's compiling right now. > =A0> > =A0> I'll post my findings and impressions on results and performance rig= ht after > =A0> the next reboot. > > So, how is it going? =A0Any benchmarks yet? =A0I'm curious > if the new gcc version will really make a significant > difference. > I'm not as worried about performance as I am about compatibilty. Various software suites have started using newer GCCisms in their code. One example I can give from the top of my head is Wt (www.webtoolkit.eu), which compiles with 4.4, but not with 4.2. I shamefully haven't dug any deeper to check which particular syntactical construct offended 4.2. Yes, one might say, after all it's the upstream developers who ought to make sure their software compiles on FreeBSD, but some aditional overhead on the shoulders of our port maintainers should be expected. > Best regards > =A0 Oliver > > -- > Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing b. M. > Handelsregister: Registergericht Muenchen, HRA 74606, =A0Gesch=E4ftsfuehr= ung: > secnetix Verwaltungsgesellsch. mbH, Handelsregister: Registergericht M=FC= n- > chen, HRB 125758, =A0Gesch=E4ftsf=FChrer: Maik Bachmann, Olaf Erb, Ralf G= ebhart > > FreeBSD-Dienstleistungen, -Produkte und mehr: =A0http://www.secnetix.de/b= sd > > "UNIX was not designed to stop you from doing stupid things, > because that would also stop you from doing clever things." > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0-- Doug Gwyn > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org= " > --=20 Good, fast & cheap. Pick any two.