Date: 21 Jul 2000 17:19:41 -0700 From: asami@FreeBSD.org (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) To: Brian Clapper <bmc@WillsCreek.COM> Cc: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <n@nectar.com>, SADA Kenji <sada@bsdclub.org>, ports@FreeBSD.org, ust@cert.siemens.de, andrews@technologist.com, rjoseph@mammalia.org Subject: Re: sysutils/fileutils Message-ID: <vqclmyvvwwy.fsf@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> In-Reply-To: Brian Clapper's message of "Tue, 18 Jul 2000 15:45:18 -0400 (EDT)" References: <20000716134043.A89318@manatee.mammalia.org> <200007181616.BAA25662@home.bsdclub.org> <20000718140737.B1464@hamlet.nectar.com> <200007181945.PAA71019@tributary.inside.willscreek.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* From: Brian Clapper <bmc@WillsCreek.COM> * However, removing gnuls from fileutils also doesn't make much sense. If I * install the fileutils port, I expect to get *all* of it, not some arbitrary * subset. For whatever it's worth, this line of reasoning is not valid. You can always make fileutils depend on gnuls, that way people will either get gnuls only or all of fileutils. Satoshi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?vqclmyvvwwy.fsf>