Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 13 Mar 2005 00:26:56 -0800
From:      "Loren M. Lang" <lorenl@alzatex.com>
To:        Jerry McAllister <jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: What's the easiest way to do a backup and verify?
Message-ID:  <20050313082656.GB18080@alzatex.com>
In-Reply-To: <200503071447.j27ElWW10343@clunix.cl.msu.edu>
References:  <1946173739.20050307145644@wanadoo.fr> <200503071447.j27ElWW10343@clunix.cl.msu.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--vGgW1X5XWziG23Ko
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 09:47:31AM -0500, Jerry McAllister wrote:
> >=20
> > Is there an easy way to combine a backup and verify when doing backups
> > with dump?
> >=20
> > On Windows NT it's just a matter of checking a box.  I seem to recall
> > the last time I looked into this on UNIX there was no easy way to
> > accomplish a verify operation for a backup, but perhaps things have
> > changed with FreeBSD 5.3 (?).
> >=20
> > I've never had a problem with backup (I backup to DAT tape), but I'd
> > feel better if every backup was followed by a verify to make sure the
> > tape is readable.
>=20
> Actually, if used frequently for backups - such as every day, DAT is
> notoriously prone to failure.    So, it is a good idea to check dumps
> made to DAT.   Unfortunately, there is not a reasonable way to=20
> automatically do it.   There is a verify, but it cannot work on a
> running system, because it compares files (inodes) on the tape back
> to the ones on disk.  Any changes mean an error, even if it was a
> real change in the file between the time it was written and the
> time it was read back.
>=20
> The only real thing you can do is to read back the tape and look
> for a couple of files with fairly high inode numbers for each file
> system dumped.    If you can read them, you can assume the tape
> is readable.

I'm not very familiar with tapes, but I think that the dump is written
straight out to something like /dev/st0 right?  So then wouldn't a
second dump of the same snapshot diffed to the tape device be a good for
a verify?

Position tape at beginning of dump
dump / | diff - /dev/st0

Though I don't have much experience with either dump or tapes to verify.

>=20
> ////jerry
>=20
> >=20
> > --=20
> > Anthony
> >=20
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o=
rg"

--=20
I sense much NT in you.
NT leads to Bluescreen.
Bluescreen leads to downtime.
Downtime leads to suffering.
NT is the path to the darkside.
Powerful Unix is.

Public Key: ftp://ftp.tallye.com/pub/lorenl_pubkey.asc
Fingerprint: CEE1 AAE2 F66C 59B5 34CA  C415 6D35 E847 0118 A3D2
=20

--vGgW1X5XWziG23Ko
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCM/lQbTXoRwEYo9IRAk8LAJ49uNlXlL2YIyqd/oz+o/H05ZrUBgCfbvg2
fdxJv70AddvJbExI8zqoh+4=
=EeLW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--vGgW1X5XWziG23Ko--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050313082656.GB18080>