From nobody Thu May 28 15:50:12 2026 X-Original-To: freebsd-pkgbase@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4gRB1V6gzGz6fvgT for ; Thu, 28 May 2026 15:56:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from md-koch@t-online.de) Received: from mailout10.t-online.de (mailout10.t-online.de [194.25.134.21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mailout00.t-online.de", Issuer "Telekom Security ServerID OV Class 2 CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4gRB1V22txz3sxZ for ; Thu, 28 May 2026 15:56:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from md-koch@t-online.de) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none Received: from fwd75.aul.t-online.de (fwd75.aul.t-online.de [10.223.144.101]) by mailout10.t-online.de (Postfix) with SMTP id 9BE36397D2; Thu, 28 May 2026 17:50:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.3] ([88.152.192.139]) by fwd75.t-online.de with (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted) esmtp id 1wSczs-4YyyUC0; Thu, 28 May 2026 17:50:12 +0200 Message-ID: <83237af5-f8db-479f-992a-1fa9f1b5878e@t-online.de> Date: Thu, 28 May 2026 17:50:12 +0200 List-Id: Packaging the FreeBSD base system List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-pkgbase List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-pkgbase@FreeBSD.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: different outcome freebsd-version -kru To: Mark Millard , freebsd-pkgbase@FreeBSD.org References: <07c33cf7-8a08-4f09-9084-419eaa29e1ec@t-online.de> <0018e700-40f3-4e60-9b14-bf649f3102b1@t-online.de> <8ABC7D71-7FFA-4B50-9868-78436322B503@yahoo.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Manfred Koch In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TOI-EXPURGATEID: 150726::1779983412-CCFF69FD-CFF99544/0/0 CLEAN NORMAL X-TOI-MSGID: cc744367-8ba9-49b4-9064-6988c0bcb561 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=t-online.de; s=20260216; t=1779983413; i=md-koch@t-online.de; bh=i07eLqJ0nZayRZYY1lVKZ+p7N+JVb5/hzI/0tmcKW1o=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=a+ZyGevp4Kc6QLnIQ4znYtVHomgYFg9P9hjoSgm86zA2EC2uoGLg3uXw0s3mYDTpf PTyJxQzu7+PHcxqjJ8AHv9HHL18OmdV8nmsWN1gAmAyQTc5ATJwblrUAwc/zizVb6v fNdD7AvsZo0orKu8khh79n0p5OHNxGXVfmav40FWhM+I0e25aYMtXn3hNUFODpdaA4 BCcai/oegO79CcLUXIDfhXhpTxqJ6Qy3Ysa7t+2kgK5Lid1k57DwBPhqnceZKtYGi8 CL+jMDIylKtRoE65rS4aVXzKlssEWytqb0xRiHS3+JbK2M7cubzHNNHPrCvw1I2QVC KhWNZVKWJscYg== X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:3320, ipnet:194.25.0.0/16, country:DE] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4gRB1V22txz3sxZ X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated Hi Mark, I installed the FreeBSD-set-kernels-15.0 and rebooted. freebsd-version -kru shows: 15.0-RELEASE-p9 15.0-RELEASE-p9 15.0-RELEASE-p9 You saved me a fresh installation, Super! I appreciate your distinguished help Manfred On 5/28/26 02:03, Mark Millard wrote: > On 5/27/26 12:28, Manfred Koch wrote: >> On 5/26/26 22:58, Mark Millard wrote: >> >>> pkg info FreeBSD-kernel\* >> Hi, >> >> here are the outputs from the commands: >> >> pkg info FreeBSD-kernel\* >> FreeBSD-kernel-man-15.0 > The above (and below) indicates that you got a partial pkgbase install > (some pkgbase pkackages) but without any kernels (or related modules > that those pkgbase packages also provide). The created a mixed system > with older, non-packaged kernels. > > I expect that you will be able to simply install the kernel(s) (with the > modules that go with them) that you want from 15.0-RELEASE-p9, given > what already has worked to get what you have . It may rename any old > kernels and modules in /boot/kernel*/ that match by name to have a > .pkgsave at the end of the name. Those you should be able to delete once > things are known to be working alright. I doubt that it would instead > create the new files as instead having a .pkgnew added to the end of > the intended name. > > Another thing to possibly report would be the output from: > > # pkg info FreeBSD-set-\* > > If that ends up without and FreeBSD-set-* being listed, then my below > guess would be wrong. > > My guess is that you have an installation based on use of such sets. > If so, continuing do use them to get the kernel(s) (and modules) as well > would be: > > # pkg install FreeBSD-set-kernels-15.0 > > (Such pkg sets just reference other pkgbase packages, so it should lead > to the kernel pkg's being installed.) > > I do not know if you would want the debug information too: > > # pkg install FreeBSD-set-kernels-dbg-15.0 > > Once you have new kernels, if such works, you get to reboot and see what > happens. So you may want to have emergency copies of things you know the > status of before you start this process. > > I will note that I do not have a 15.0-RELEASE context myself. The > closest is stable/15 based instead of releng/15.0 based and is > definitely newer in various respects. And my installation has all the > pgkbase packages for stable/15 as of when it was last updated, even ones > not used by bsdinstall. > >> pkg info -d FreeBSD-clibs\* >> FreeBSD-clibs-15.0: >> FreeBSD-clibs-dev-15.0p9: >>         FreeBSD-clibs-15.0 >>         FreeBSD-clibs-15.0 (libc.so.7) >>         FreeBSD-clibs-15.0 (libgcc_s.so.1) >>         gcc13-13.3.0_3 (libgcc_s.so.1) >>         gcc14-14.2.0_4 (libgcc_s.so.1) > Note: Ignore the gcc* examples. it is a known issue with file name > matching for libgcc_s.so.1 being insufficient information to actually > make them a match for the system's libgcc_s.so.1 : false positive. > >>         FreeBSD-clibs-15.0 (libsys.so.7) >>         FreeBSD-clibs-15.0 (libthr.so.3) >> FreeBSD-clibs-lib32-15.0: >>         FreeBSD-clibs-15.0 >> >> pkg check -s -a >> >> Checking all packages: 100% > The above only checked that what was installed via pkg is still valid. > It would not report things that pkg did not itself install from > packages. Still, the 100% without problem reports is good news. > >> Additionally I have altered FreeBSD-base.conf consistent to "latest" >> but that doesn't change nothing in uname -a. > latest vs. quarterly is a port-package issue, not a sys†em or > base-package issue. uname provides system information, not ports > information. > >> Could be a mixed System >> >> Thanks a lot for your effort >> Manfred >> >> >> >> >