From nobody Mon Oct 7 16:57:22 2024 X-Original-To: java@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4XMlgl0GS4z5YQd0 for ; Mon, 07 Oct 2024 16:57:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R11" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4XMlgk5XvMz4cq2 for ; Mon, 7 Oct 2024 16:57:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1728320242; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=zk47EQ9SktwIXF7pm0pONkzXq/KyvJ44dF4gJXbgfQM=; b=QJjImmidcrImZ1ZNTqDdHPmTCZsOvfRHHmVlb64RpuIAjEvcGc5qkO9tBz8aqz3jVwlx62 4CYOPKlUq8Ea/wShjnfo8eMgSDAAH44NlSdffo/QeQwdWgySOghxEKfd5nnD1d/fYg5exM 2XMe/PKVGfRM8Ug0ZEMISMIoDEQ4Ru+6yZPxptKKQsZSZrBXgBtjKzhW16lV0R2VtMBDhf MBbOyPihu3ja31CCxxH0Uv6E41VcBtQF9wk+7uXp06lAG2lOCIXJoCFhvYjnmKY2NR2IvZ T52aYGQwAh51batFhwSCImS49OEi/3/qzrIIhNWoa2GOm3NTNNOa1J8p+0yoww== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1728320242; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=DJnSQhErXP1xaartV8l/SBUgmEon62lGdVT3y3ulmzBnp951M9SD7PrafX02RBA1LOpj/m geeD1TUUgjuWIqnUnwumVOK4qFCn9Xr205HchvyEtX4zxQJGmFl00ZpIsJA8r7r08n4mn6 ZPDGQwwQ16Kiyu3rGtZ9A0+ieBbfuBIDDgTe0dAX4pNikQ/kCENu9XhLpzkr8VD1v9Tpfp N1/QydrESTmdysnq586FNCAfCBB5afejH36QreJZ9vcCsvIZAluw4Jo4Q5E557ZqX29Nvn rHUBo1ZN+8zdyuUtH1X6pmCv8NdlfpolLlKD+lTh8fGMfm4kS2JmRsCs1GPp4Q== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4XMlgk57tfzvRP for ; Mon, 7 Oct 2024 16:57:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 497GvMTd058213 for ; Mon, 7 Oct 2024 16:57:22 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 497GvMAR058212 for java@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 7 Oct 2024 16:57:22 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: java@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 239890] java/openjdk11: openjdk 11.0.4+11.2 JDBC connections fail with IPv6 addresses Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2024 16:57:22 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: antonfb@hesiod.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: java@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-java List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D239890 --- Comment #16 from antonfb@hesiod.org --- Greg Lewis removed the V6ONLY clearing back in 2019. IMO this was a bad idea. In his comment in this PR he says you can't do both ipv4 and ipv6. If you force it things break without being clear how they break. IPv6 and IPv4 support is important. I would like to know more information about this and for Greg to explicitly mark these PR's as will not do or whatever that should be so that people do= n't waste time to figure out how to make this work since the breakage seems to = be intended. I would be happier if this code had the V6ONLY stuff restored and the IPv4 preferred stack stuff kept. Seems to me that someone has to investigate and choose to configure their j= dk to use the duel stack environment and make that clear. So that people can choose to run things even if there may be problems. Make the problems clear and let people choose what to do. IMO the V6ONLY stuff should be explicitly configurable in some way. Like if neither v4 or v6 is preferred clear V6ONLY, if v6 is preferred but v4 is not then set V6ONLY, and if v4 is set the issue is moot because v6 sockets will= not be created. Let people run a configuration which works for them, even if it is discoura= ged. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=