From owner-freebsd-security Wed Mar 24 12:21:44 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from funky.monkey.org (funky.monkey.org [152.160.231.196]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C17B14BE3 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 1999 12:21:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dugsong@monkey.org) Received: by funky.monkey.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 910AA23D84; Wed, 24 Mar 1999 15:21:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by funky.monkey.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7100315CC2; Wed, 24 Mar 1999 15:21:19 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 15:21:19 -0500 (EST) From: Dug Song To: Mike Thompson Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Kerberos vs SSH In-Reply-To: <4.1.19990324113601.0097aeb0@mail.dnai.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, 24 Mar 1999, Mike Thompson wrote: > Does anyone here have an opinion as to whether rsh and Kerberos > can be used in this manner for efficient and secure communication > between web servers running a distributed application? use SSH v1 with Kerberos v4. http://www.monkey.org/~dugsong/ssh-afs-kerberos.html or, pay for SSH v2 and Kerberos v5. :-) -d. --- http://www.monkey.org/~dugsong/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message