From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 3 20:05:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D6DC16A4CE; Sat, 3 Jul 2004 20:05:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F69C43D31; Sat, 3 Jul 2004 20:05:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost.freebsd.dk [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i63K5tom054740; Sat, 3 Jul 2004 22:05:55 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: Scott Long From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 03 Jul 2004 13:48:32 MDT." <40E70D90.4090304@freebsd.org> Date: Sat, 03 Jul 2004 22:05:55 +0200 Message-ID: <54739.1088885155@critter.freebsd.dk> Sender: phk@critter.freebsd.dk cc: Alfred Perlstein cc: fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: tweaking mounted filesystems by fsid X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Jul 2004 20:05:58 -0000 In message <40E70D90.4090304@freebsd.org>, Scott Long writes: >Can't comment on your main questions, but there has been talk about removing nmount since the work was never finished and the benefits >never realized. If you'd like to breath some life into it, feel free. That would only give us problems. As far as I recall removing nmount would make us instantly run out of binary mount flags (the main problem which nmount was written to address). -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.