From owner-freebsd-java Wed Jun 27 23:27:28 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mail.xmission.com (mail.xmission.com [198.60.22.22]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1FA537B403 for ; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 23:27:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from glewis@misty.eyesbeyond.com) Received: from [166.70.2.59] (helo=misty.eyesbeyond.com) by mail.xmission.com with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1) id 15FVGt-0000tG-00; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 00:27:24 -0600 Received: (from glewis@localhost) by misty.eyesbeyond.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) id f5S6RJY12899; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 15:57:19 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from glewis) Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 15:57:18 +0930 From: Greg Lewis To: shivak Cc: java@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: production jdk Message-ID: <20010628155718.A12880@misty.eyesbeyond.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from anarkky@cyberwar.com on Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 11:21:41PM -0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 11:21:41PM -0400, shivak wrote: > when is the FreeBSD team expected to complete a production quality JDK for > Java 2 (1.2) ?? By production quality, I mean comparable in > performance/stability to the official JDK. When we're legally able to :). In terms of stability, I do currently use the 1.2.2 native version in a production environment with no problems. Its probably not as good in terms of performance though, although the Open Source JITs certainly help that. -- Greg Lewis Email : glewis@eyesbeyond.com Eyes Beyond Mobile: 0419 868 494 Information Technology Web : http://www.eyesbeyond.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message