From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Tue Jun 30 08:11:08 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5EBC9905E5 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 08:11:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [IPv6:2607:f678:1010::34]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B59EB1D08; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 08:11:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id t5U89twu056570 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 30 Jun 2015 01:09:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.14.2/Submit) with UUCP id t5U89sH1056569; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 01:09:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from fbsd81 by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA08307; Tue, 30 Jun 15 00:12:23 PDT Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 00:12:21 -0700 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com (Perry Hutchison) To: kostikbel@gmail.com, jhibbits@freebsd.org Cc: yaneurabeya@gmail.com, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, andreast-list@fgznet.ch Subject: Re: powerpc and powerpc64 builds broken Message-Id: <55924155.C5CZ0z4FGBeLJpUa%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <8C09575A-B885-4F41-BFF8-46FEC028E755@gmail.com> <20150628193222.GP2080@kib.kiev.ua> <559059ED.80104@fgznet.ch> <20150629053248.GQ2080@kib.kiev.ua> <20150630054348.GX2080@kib.kiev.ua> In-Reply-To: <20150630054348.GX2080@kib.kiev.ua> User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 08:11:08 -0000 Konstantin Belousov wrote: > I think trying to understand why the hack was added is not > possible. In an ideal world, "svn blame" would identify the commit in which it was added, and that commit's log entry would explain why :)