From owner-freebsd-current  Wed Dec 13 18:24:54 1995
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id SAA22959
          for current-outgoing; Wed, 13 Dec 1995 18:24:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Root.COM (implode.Root.COM [198.145.90.17])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id SAA22945
          for <current@freebsd.org>; Wed, 13 Dec 1995 18:24:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from corbin.Root.COM (corbin [198.145.90.50]) by Root.COM (8.6.12/8.6.5) with ESMTP id SAA00766; Wed, 13 Dec 1995 18:24:42 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by corbin.Root.COM (8.6.12/8.6.5) with SMTP id SAA00219; Wed, 13 Dec 1995 18:24:52 -0800
Message-Id: <199512140224.SAA00219@corbin.Root.COM>
To: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: VOP_READIR revisited 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 13 Dec 95 18:37:58 MST."
             <199512140137.SAA00700@phaeton.artisoft.com> 
From: David Greenman <davidg@Root.COM>
Reply-To: davidg@Root.COM
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 1995 18:24:51 -0800
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

>I believe that it also resolves all the outstanding "cookie" issues
>cleanly, without unduly complicating the interfaces (in fact, UFS
>complication is decreased slightly and VOP_READDIR in msdosfs, cd9660fs,
>hpfs, ntfs, etc. becomes vastly *less* complicated for NFS exportable
>versions of the file systems).

   Cleanly??? Your proposal sounds like total kludgeware to me.

-DG