From owner-freebsd-chat Sun Apr 28 12:18:54 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12FD137B404 for ; Sun, 28 Apr 2002 12:18:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by flood.ping.uio.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id 415CF5346; Sun, 28 Apr 2002 21:18:48 +0200 (CEST) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: "Jason C. Wells" Cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How much PAM is enough? References: From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 28 Apr 2002 21:18:48 +0200 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Lines: 17 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org "Jason C. Wells" writes: > On 28 Apr 2002, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > Because pam_nologin *is* how FreeBSD supports /etc/nologin. > It does? Pam_nologin doesn't appear in the default /etc/pam.conf. There > must be more to PAM than is readily apparent from the config files. It does in -CURRENT. > (BTW, I happened across your message in the archives that showed the > -CURRENT is using pam.d now. I expect -STABLE to do so soon, so I have > adjusted my config.) No, I will not MFC any of my PAM work. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message