Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 08 Oct 2011 08:11:04 +0000
From:      "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
To:        Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@gmail.com>
Cc:        Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com>, Glen Barber <gjb@freebsd.org>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com>, Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
Subject:   Re: aliasing (or renaming) kern.geom.debugflags
Message-ID:  <30626.1318061464@critter.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 07 Oct 2011 17:22:54 -0400." <CACqU3MVgVUxe%2BMtaf9wq6oz5=PZAq=Sx-ihyQh1GyjD3PXmjhQ@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <CACqU3MVgVUxe+Mtaf9wq6oz5=PZAq=Sx-ihyQh1GyjD3PXmjhQ@mail.gmail.com>
, Arnaud Lacombe writes:

>If you expose a setting, you cannot rely on a user not to use it even
>if you told him not to. As long as this is exposed and usable, it will
>be used, even more when it was documented.

This is clearly marked as a debug tool, the only bug here, is that people
tell users to abuse it in the documentation.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?30626.1318061464>