From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 16 13:32:10 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEBF816A4CE for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 13:32:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from carver.gumbysoft.com (carver.gumbysoft.com [66.220.23.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2ACC43D1D for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 13:32:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dwhite@gumbysoft.com) Received: by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9571772DD2; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 13:32:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 931E572DB5; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 13:32:10 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 13:32:10 -0800 (PST) From: Doug White To: Seigo Tanimura In-Reply-To: <200403160519.i2G5J0V6023193@urban> Message-ID: <20040316133013.P42715@carver.gumbysoft.com> References: <200403160519.i2G5J0V6023193@urban> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Is MTX_CONTESTED evil? X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 21:32:10 -0000 On Tue, 16 Mar 2004, Seigo Tanimura wrote: > What would it be like if we axed MTX_CONTEST and let > _mtx_unlock_sleep() wake up all of the blocked threads? Excuse my naievete, but this sounds like it would trigger a thundering-herd response on a heavily contested mutex (like Giant). That would be Bad. :) -- Doug White | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve dwhite@gumbysoft.com | www.FreeBSD.org